Here's the Facebook video of Shull's interview addressing prominent Clackamas County government issues, and to some degree his re-election campaign: (1) Mark Shull | Facebook
(posted by Elvis Clark on August 31, 2024)
Clackamas County Coordinated Housing Access Improvement Program (CHA) receives national award - becoming the only county in Oregon to get this award, given to government programs that successfully help place homeless people into decent shelter /housing. (In the photo just above here, the Clackamas Board of County Commissioners pose with the hard-working county employees who staff CHA.)
(This seems like a genuine award for Clackamas County employee accomplishment - just my noting that sometimes there seems to be a bit of a racket in government agencies getting awards just by their being in existence. But CHA really does seem like great progress and deserving of such award.)
CHA is funded by federal and state monies.
At the Thursday, August 1, 2024, Board of County Commissioners meeting; the Board unanimously approved a new law which would help the Clackamas County Sheriff remove (tow) Recreational Vehicles (RVs) parked on public streets illegally. Seems Sheriff Deputies cannot move an illegally parked RV when people who refuse to move their RV are in it, in other words living in it.
Commissioners expressed concern about making sure that those homeless folks who have their RVs towed and impounded can still find appropriate shelter and at some point, can recover their impounded RV. I testified in support of the new county towing regulation, pointing out that the recent U.S Supreme Court Decision allows cities and counties more options in designating areas where those without homes can camp and/or park their RV (that they live in). I think that Metro's homeless services and affordable housing funds could be tapped to fund Clackamas County establishing an RV parking area for those who call their RV their home and want to continue living in their RVs which are currently parked illegally on public streets in Clackamas. (Cascade Policy Institute recommended a few years ago now that Multnomah County consider letting those living in illegally parked RVs in Multnomah County move and park their RVs at the EXPO Center, out off I-5 on Hayden Island.)
Lastly, Clackamas County government is in the process of repurposing the former Women's Center building near Sellwood just east of the Waverly neighborhood into a stabilization center. Completion of this renovation and new stabilization center is scheduled for some time in the year 2025.
Here's KATU's news reporting on Clackamas' new stabilization center coming in 2025:
Clackamas County to open new stabilization center for addiction care by fall 2025 (katu.com)
(posted by Elvis Clark on August 1, 2024)
Clackamas County has 56 acres of farmland that developers are wanting to make into 28 new homes, each home to sit on a 2 acre lots. Young people and families are so wanting to get into their first home with a yard, and bringing in some low value farmland for building relatively inexpensive homes would seem like a no-brainer. In fact, if the zoning were to be dropped from 2 acre lot minimums to 3,000 square feet lot minimums, government could create ten times as much new housing as it is currently with rural lands at the outer edge of urban areas.
But no. Oregon's Land Use Board of Appeals is standing in the way of allowing more new housing supply. In the pdf article download called "UPzonFarmLnd24Jul," The Oregon Land Use Board denies Clackamas County the legal right to reduce the minimum lot size for new housing from 10 acres down to 2 acres.
If the state of Oregon were really serious about building a lot of new homes to meet all the demand for new homes in Oregon, it would allow the conversion of farmland with access to transportation arterials such as in this case Beaver Creek Road into small homes with yards of 2,000 or so square feet.
(posted by Elvis Clark)
UPzonFarmLnd24Jul (pdf)
DownloadOnly a few months after gaining approval for a hike in property tax proceeds (paid by property owners in Milwaukie, Happy Valley and others), the Clackamas Fire District enters into a contract to service the fire and emergency needs of the City of Sandy, Oregon. So, the taxpayer in Milwaukie has to ask themselves: are we helping to subsidize the city of Sandy's fire and emergency operations? If yes, why is this fair? These same questions also apply to other cities in the Clackamas Fire District, such as the city of Happy Valley for instance.
Here's the news release about this agreement between the Clackamas Fire District and the city of Sandy: Sandy Fire Contract for Service - Clackamas Fire District
(posted by Elvis Clark on February 1, 2024)
The photo just above here shows Clackamas County's Veteran Village and its pods for sheltering veterans - the County Veteran Village houses 15 homeless veterans. The County is planning to build 24 new transitional housing units for non-veterans right next door to the County's Veteran Village.
These 24 transitional houses may be structured as eight pods with three housing units inside each.
The cost of building this new POD compound is about $3 million, while the compound's annual operating costs are expected to total $1.5 million, according to Clackamas County staff. Metro regional government will pick up these costs, using the tax proceeds from Metro's special income tax for providing housing services. Those sheltered in this new POD compound will be single adults. Each POD with three housing units inside them will have a common kitchen and bathroom. No narcotic drugs nor alcohol will be permitted on these premises.
Those sheltering in this new POD compound are permitted to stay up to 24 months in order to get the mental and/or addiction help they need to become more self-sufficient, and ready to move up to permanent housing. The Veteran Village and this new pod compound are located out on the east side of I-205, on 115th Avenue south of highway 26. The site is in the middle of an industrial zone. So, the County will likely provide transportation to medical and other services for these sheltered residents.
The last homeless count for Clackamas is between 300 and 400 persons. So, this new homeless compound is really only a start for addressing Clackamas' homeless. The Board of County Commissioners voted 4 to 0 to approve going forward with construction of the new POD complex.
Hopefully, the in-migration of new arrivals to the Portland Oregon metro region will not overwhelm the County's incremental shelter additions and efforts to get the homeless "back on their feet."
(posted by Elvis Clark on December 13, 2023).
I testified during the Public Communication part of this week's Clackamas Board of County Commissioner meeting about Milwaukie's Resolution to ban natural gas utility service in Milwaukie, stating that Milwaukie's plan to eliminate Natural Gas Utility service in Milwaukie is misguided. That if it were to become effective it would be a huge cost burden on Milwaukie residents and force people to turn to less cleaner heating alternatives such as burning more wood or using portable indoor propane heaters.
My written testimony, included in the record of today's Clackamas County Board meeting, against Milwaukie City Council's Net Zero Climate goal, is much more pointed than my oral testimony presented to the Clackamas Board today (11/30/23). You can read my written testimony to the Clackamas Board of County Commissioners just below in the PDF download "ClackTest23Nov30".
My oral testimony and written testimonies against Milwaukie's attempt at banning natural gas utility service was very well received by the Clackamas Chair and Commissioners.
To my relief, the Board of County Commissioners has already submitted a letter to the Oregon legislature in support of letting people have a robust choice of fuels, including natural gas utility service. The following link is to Clackamas County's letter stating its strong support for maintaining fuel choice (including full access to natural gas utility service):
(posted by Elvis Clark on November 30, 2023)
ClackTest23Nov30 (pdf)
DownloadIf you recall, Clackamas Board of Commissioners had a month-long saga this summer over whether the County government's Equity and Inclusion Office shouldn't be reformed if not disbanded. After all, in many people's opinions (including my own), this relatively recently formed Office has been sucking up over $800,000 in annual County budget while not delivering much obvious and tangible in return.
Sounds like, from what my sources are saying, is that one of the three staff persons that make up the County Equity and Inclusion Office is being re-assigned to writing grants from inside the County's Human Resources Department. And the other two "Equity" employees may be let go entirely.
Commissioners Savas and Schrader talk of creating a new Equity, Diversity and Inclusion Office. This might be a strategy of diverting attention from critics who oppose getting rid of the County's Equity and Inclusion Office.
(posted by Elvis Clark on September 1, 2023)
Mayor Batey and many folks in the city of Milwaukie want to build out more elaborate parks. As is many times the case, the rub is money.
Neither the City nor the County can build out Milwaukie Bay Park for instance, without a new funding source.
The County referred a property tax increase to voters back in 2014, but it is rejected. And interestingly, Commissioner Schrader isn't supportive of referring a parks related property tax again.
I don't think Clackamas voters would approve a property tax increase, nor let Milwaukie out of North Clackamas Parks and Recreation District (NCPR).
Happy Valley was able to escape NCPR and establish its own city parks department, because the Oregon state legislature enacted laws allowing Happy Valley out of NCPR. I suppose Milwaukie could try this route. This might be the only viable way of Milwaukie getting back its parks.
Personally, I think our Parks are doing just fine without more property taxes. I visit the Milwaukie Community Center and the surrounding County Park; and it is pretty magnificent compared to what it was like in the early 2000s.
Below here is Mayor Batey's editorial for your reading pleasure.
(posted by Elvis Clark on July 22, 2023)
Batey23Jul (pdf)
DownloadI plan to develop a compromise position which helps retain, but also pare, some portion of the rather large $800,00 per year County budget for Clackamas county's Equity, Inclusion and Diversity (EID).
EID can be taken too far by government to where it becomes unconstitutional, because it uses reverse discriminatio. There may be an argument for doing work to promote an inviting/inclusive county for all people, even while reducing county Equity Office government staffing.
Stay tuned.
(posted by Elvis Clark on June 23, 2023)
(posted by Elvis Clark
Here's the link to the Clackamas Review OpEd by this anonymous Clackamas County government employee:
What this employee fails to appreciate is that maybe the Clackamas Board of Commissioners are focused on what actually works to raise the quality of of life for Clackamas residents, and not so much the failing ideological policies of Multnomah County.
Consider that Multnomah County loses population since the recent onset of Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion government programs - enacted since the Spring of 2020 in the aftermath of the George Floyd case. According to the most recent U.S Census Bureau data, since April 2020 Multnomah County has lost over 18,000 in its population while Clackamas County has gained over 1,800 in its population size. Surely, not all of these the folks moving out of Multnomah County are ignorant and maybe they are escaping Multnomah's failing ideological driven programs and policies.
Consider also that Multnomah's Homeless population continues to to balloon while Clackamas sees a greater than 30% drop in homelessness, based on the most recent County homeless counts. Maybe Clackamas believes in tough love , rather than the enablement of bad life choices/behaviors that Multnomah accepts unquestionably and routinely. How enlightened is it to let people go through life in a drug induced daze?
The complaining Clackamas government employee, anonymously writing in the Clackamas Review, then goes on to state that Clackamas chose not to accept state and Metro monies to buy more shelter space (the Quality-Inn Motel conversion). He fails to mention in his criticism that this motel-to-homeless-shelter (Turn Key Project) would have housed those with drug substance abuse alongside those homeless without addictions.
Multnomah is seeing its homeless shelter projects be taken over by drug addiction, threatening the lives of those homeless not with drug addiction housed alongside in same shelter projects. Here are recent news stories which demonstrate the risk that the Clackamas Board of Commissioners weighed when deciding not to approve buying the Quality-Inn-Motel (Project Turnkey):
https://oregoncatalyst.com/69201-fox-news-pdx-homeless-rest-villages-disaster.html
Finally, the complaining Clackamas County Government employee talks of budget cuts and those discussed surrounding Clackamas' Equity Inclusion Office (EIO). Maybe the complaining employee who works alongside the EIO is actually wanting to preserve their own job, pay and benefits - Not so much an altruistic wanting to uphold moralistic virtues - those said to be represented by Diversity, Equity and Inclusion programs.
(posted by Elvis Clark on June 16, 2023)
The Clackamas County Board of Commissioners voted to re-allocate $5 million from the Sheriff's General Budget allocation in order to help pay for Clackamas' new Court House. (Sheriff Bradenburg's photo above here.)
Here's the link to the Sheriff's letter of Opposition to the County's budget re-allocation:
https://www.clackamas.us/sheriff/2023-05-19-CCSONR-SheriffsMessage.html
Here's the link to Oregon Public Broadcasting's reporting on this budget tug-a-war:
https://www.opb.org/article/2023/05/23/clackamas-county-sheriff-budget-courthouse/
(Chair Tootie Smith's above here.)
In defense of the Clackamas County Commissioners voting to re-allocate $5 million from the Sheriff's department to help pay for the much needed new Court House:
(1) The Clackamas Sheriff department under Bradenburg has the tendency to pad its budget by carrying year-over-year, unfilled staff vacancies. The Commissioners, who need desperately to find monies for replacing a faltering Court House, are only asking the Sheriff to not fill these continually unfilled Sheriff department vacancies.
(2) The Clackamas Sheriff Department just had a windfall of $22 million per year provided by voters passing an extra Sheriff property tax levy. I guess the Sheriff would rather the County Commissioners ask property taxpayers for even more money to pay for another facet of public safety - the New County Court House.
Here's why Clackamas County is replacing the old Court House:
Built in 1936, the current courthouse was designed to serve a population of less than 50,000 and can no longer adequately serve a population of 420,000 that continues to grow. The current courthouse is functionally obsolete, poses significant safety risks and contributes to delays in justice.
(posted by Elvis Clark on May 26, 2023.)
Dahlgren says Oregon and the City of Portland are "enabling" the bad behavior (drug addiction) on the part of a majority of the homeless.
Instead of housing the addicted first (as would have been the case with Clackamas' purchase and conversion of the Quality Inn Motel), the addicted should be treated and cured first before getting structured shelter - for example a motel room.
Here's the link to the KOIN News' Interview of long, long time homeless advocate Kevin Dahlgren:
https://cdn.ca9.uscourts.gov/datastore/opinions/2023/04/17/21-16278.pdf
Meanwhile, I am still investigating the claim that some 65% of Clackamas residents want the County to purchase and convert the Quality Inn. Turns out, this 65% is based on a survey conducted by Clackamas County government via on-line survey questions during last year(2022). But what I suspect is that County staff may have phrased survey questions so as to engineer their getting the rather high public survey support for purchasing Project Turnkey. I have asked the County's Public Affairs department for these survey questions, and am still waiting for them.
Meanwhile, the Oregon state legislature is considering a bill which would give public squatting rights to street people. This is House Bill 3501 reported on by the "Oregon Catalyst" opinion news outlet. Here's the link to this Oregon Catalyst news story:
https://oregoncatalyst.com/67652-bill-hearing-expand-homeless-rights-hb-3501.html
How discouraging. The public wants the streets free of tent encampments on shared public spaces; government taxes and spends hundreds of millions to address this issue; and then you get others in government (like with Oregon House Bill 3501) working to expand homeless tent encampments on shared public spaces like sidewalks and right-of-ways.
Oregon has become a cruel joke.
God save us... from ourselves!
(posted by Elvis Clark on April 21, 2023)
The above clip and its continuation to right here is Clackamas County Government Board Chair's reasons for voting against moving forward on Clackamas County government's buying the Quality Inn Motel on Sunnyside Road (next door to Clackamas Town Center Mall) and turning it into a motel housing homeless folks with drug addictions).
I believe Chair Tootie smith makes the right decision to vote against creating a motel to house those afflicted with drug addiction. The plan was to offer treatment to these addicted tenants, but there was no guarantee these tenants would act civilly and accept the treatment services.
The things Chair Smith's critics (on the left) are missing is that Clackamas spends $3 million currently giving motel shelter to those homeless which are NOT afflicted with drug addiction and other behavioral issues. These critics assume that the Quality Inn was to serve Clackamas' current County sheltered people; but this was not to be the case per plan.
(posted by Elvis Clark on April 15, 2023)
Meanwhile, I plan to investigate the claim/survey that some 68% of Clackamas residents wanted the County to buy the Quality Inn Motel and convert it to a motel for the drug addicted. I seriously doubt that this survey asked the right question of those surveyed. But I am looking into this claim/survey; and will report back this next week.
Chair Smith (above) voted against Clackamas County buying the Quality -Inn Motel on Sunny Side Road and turning it into a shelter for homeless people with addictions. It would have used state monies for buying the motel and Metro regional government monies for providing addiction treatment services.
"Progressive" Mayors like Milwaukie's Mayor Batey have since criticized Chair Smith for rejecting the County buying what was to become an addict motel. This criticism seems very unfair, because if you remember; Clackamas County Voters voted against Metro regional government's funding for homeless services but it is only because Multnomah and Washington Counties voted and approved Metro's homeless services measure that the Addict Motel is made possible.
Clackamas County per its last homeless count (ealy 2023) actually sees a decrease in homelessness in the County; whereas Washington County and Multnomah County both see increases in homelessness. I know for sure that Multnomah County has increased its sepnding on homelessness much more so than Clackamas County.
It could be a case in which if "you don't build it, they won't come."
Then you also have to say to yourself maybe Mayor Batey should offer to have an addict motel located in her Island Station neighborhood,
(posted by Elvis Clark on April 8, 2023)
Chair Tootie Smith went from being the third yes vote (against Two NO votes) for buying the Quality Inn motel on Sunnyside Road...to now being the third and deciding vote against buying this Motel (to have been turned by the County into a homeless shelter for drug addicted homeless people). It would have had what is called wrap around services to offer drug addiction treatment and turning lives away from drugs (at least that is the ideal, although practice often does not live up to such ideals).
The state of Oregon would have paid the cost of the motel purchase and Metro would have funded the operating costs. It is part of a state program called Project Turnkey.
Project Turnkey comes under the Federal government notion called "Home First." which says you first house the addicted homeless in a permanent shelter building like a motel before the addicted seek to get treatment and are off drugs. The Home First Policy has been pursued by the City of Portland and other large cities with dubious results. Yet the state of Oregon, Governor Kotek, and Metro regional government continue to pursue "Home First" permanent public housing as a solution to a large share of the Metro area's homeless population -the drug addicted. The following link: reports on Chair Smith's reversal against Clackamas' first Project Turnkey project:
A little "inside baseball" for you: The Clackamas Republican party censored Chair Smith after she voted Yes to approve the homeless shelter-motel purchase (Project Turnkey). The Party censored Smith for her original Yes Vote for buying this Project Turnkey project. Chair Smith is a Republican, and without support from her local Republican party, her re-election in 2024 becomes very doubtful.
(posted by Elvis Clark on March 24, 2023)
Governor Kotek continues to believe spending more on housing the addicted will solve the homeless problem.
But seeing how such an approach in the Multnomah County has only led to an increase in Multnomah County's homeless population, you have to question the sanity of policies such as Project Turnkey as does radio show host Lars Larson write in the following link:
https://oregoncatalyst.com/66986-lars-larson-bad-news-koteks-passed-housing-plan.html
Commissioner Schrader who is one of the two remaining yes votes for buying the Quality Inn Motel for conversion to homeless shelter points to the success of Clackamas' Veteran Pod shelter complex. But the thing to note is that Pod shelters do not qualify for Metro's homeless fund. So, motels and pods are like comparing apples with oranges.
Commissioner Shull (one of the three NO votes now) is promoting the idea of Treatment First for the drug addicted homeless. Treatment First would seem to need a new funding program than that offered by Metro and state governments.
Economist Eric Fruits writes on the serious shortcomings of Home First Policies, like Project Turnkey, in the following link:
Given the tens of millions of dollars Clackamas County government is slated to receive from Metro taxes, there would seem to be more than adequate funds available to remove unauthorized homeless encampments in Clackamas County,
If you spend $100,000 building a new shelter for each shelter-less, homeless person; 327 homeless means; you have more than enough funds to take unauthorized homeless off the street.
Of course, you would still have to design a homeless sheltering program so as to not entice more homeless folks to move to Clackamas -in pursuit of free shelter.
You also have to demand those getting these public shelter accommodations to "clean up" and get treated if drug addicted. And nudge them to pursue self-sufficiency, including gainful employment, if capable of such self sufficiency.
(posted by Elvis Clark on May 13, 2022)
Clackamas Sheriff Bradenburg is wanting to add 16 patrol officers to her Sheriff Office's staffing. But a study that the Sheriff Office itself commissioned in 2021 says only 6 more patrol officers are needed.
The Study finds that County jails could use more staffing. Three questions I would have about the Sheriff's staffing and budget are:
(1) Aren't there unfilled vacancies already receiving budget monies in the Sheriff's office, that could fill the need without additional personnel funding?
(2) Couldn't the Sheriff transfer some of the drug enforcement personnel currently on her staff to these other areas of jail and patrol officers? Drug enforcement became less useful I believe with the effective decriminalization of small amounts of drug possession, Measure 110 approved by voters in the 2020 General Election, that is; and yet the Sheriff did not reduce staffing of the County's drug enforcement unit in the aftermath of Measure 110's voter Approval.
(3) Is there a need to re-allocate some Sheriff Office funding provided by the County government's general fund budget to the District Attorney's(DA) Office to provide more Public Defenders within the DA Office; so that crimes can be fully prosecuted - instead of releasing some of those suspected of a crime - releasing them because there is a shortage of available public defenders to adjudicate the crime and its suspect?
(posted by Elvis Clark on May 13, 2022)
Nice to see some independence from the TriMet transit bureaucracy.
(posted by Elvis Clark on July 14, 2021)
The vote of County Commissioners today (June 22, 2021) is 4 for deferral and 1 for passing to the County's Planning commission. The stumbling block for the Board of Commissioners is the anti-car language in the Park Avenue Community re-development plan. This anti-car language reads as follows: “Prohibit new auto-oriented uses ..."
There are a number of existing auto dealerships on the McLoughlin corridor just south of Park Avenue (the end of the Orange line Max). A few planner enthusiasts in the community are trying to force traffic calming and no parking like development in this Corridor. This runs against the existing business interests along the corridor.
Just below is a photo review of this segment of the McLoughlin corridor (ClackTest21Je22B...PDF format). I didn't like the anti-car language and asked the Board of County Commissioners to remove it. But the second best solution occurs as the Plan is deferred until the community can agree on terms of re-developing the area.
According to Commissioner Fischer, the lone Commissioner voting not to defer, (per e-mail from her to me this afternoon) the Board is very unlikely to take up this re-development any time soon, as it is not in the Board's work plan at this point.
(posted by Elvis Clark on June 22, 2021)
ClackTest21Je22B (pdf)
DownloadA map of the Park Avenue plan area is just below the PDF files. Here is the link to the County staff's plan outline for this Park Avenue planning area:
https://dochub.clackamas.us/documents/drupal/af08858f-de61-4a38-88a2-0a521d94e60c
Just below here is my testimony opposing this idealistic Planner driven Park Avenue area higher density plan (see ClackTest21June22 (PDF). I also provide the reference document on the failure of anti-car planning (see Cascd&Cars21Je (PDF)).
(posted by Elvis Clark on June 20, 2022)
Home Builder Association wants to build vertical housing (mixed use blocksize complexes with boutique shops on first level and apartments above) along McLoughlin Blvd.
But currently, this stretch of 99 E (McLoughlin Blvd) south is home to many car businesses
Tonight, the Clackamas Board of commissioners, conducted a town hall.
One group wants to develop the Oak Grove and Jennings Lodge into a wall of mixed use retail buildings like the stretch in North Portland along MLK. Metro gave one group $100,000 to study the benefits of incorporating this area into a City.
But existing businesses in this area are objecting to the rezoning of this area, as it is likely to drive them out of business. Many of these businesses are car dealerships, and actually employ hundreds of employees.
This is my opinion but the problem with mixed use 5 story block size condo/apartment complexes is the retail tends to be high priced goods and services, which many residents are not accustomed to. The Big Box stores like Fred Meyers and Walmart are not chic with the Planner folks, but they provide affordable goods and services to existing residents.
So, what seems to happen is you have gentrification which occurs after a corridor is redone into the mixed use 5 story block size complexes. Existing residents move out, and younger urban professionals move in.
You also get a lot more traffic congestion with narrowing of McLoughlin potentially even though it is intended to be a major automobile traffic corridor. Here again existing residents suddenly find their commutes and trips are longer.
I also suspect Metro would love to build the boondoggle-like Orange Line Max to Oregon City along McLoughlin. One business owner whose business is right across from the Park Avenue Orange line train station complains at this Town Hall that the Orange line tends to see a lot of transients who end up causing property damage. So, Metro's train to dystopia never seems to end.
(posted by Elvis Clark on April 21, 2021 with follow on Elvis griping on April 23, 2021)